Two GOP Governors, 15 AGs Urge Supreme Court to Hear Gun Case

Alexander DeGarmo from Greenwood, Neb., speaks about the second amendment in front of the Supreme Court, Tuesday, June 26, 2018 in Washington.

Alexander DeGarmo from Greenwood, Neb., speaks about the second amendment in front of the Supreme Court, Tuesday, June 26, 2018 in Washington. AP Photo/Alex Brandon

 

Connecting state and local government leaders

A New York City law that restricts the transport of licensed handguns is at issue.

Top officials from 17 Republican-leaning states are urging the U.S. Supreme Court to hear a challenge a firearms group and gun owners have brought against a New York City handgun law.

The New York State Rifle & Pistol Association and three individuals petitioned the court in September to hear a challenge over a statute that bans people from transporting licensed and unloaded handguns to destinations other than one of seven shooting ranges in the city.

It’s an unjustified infringement on the Second Amendment and also violates the Commerce Clause, the petitioners argue. They say there’s no evidence that transporting a handgun, unloaded and locked in a separate container away from ammunition, poses a safety threat.

“Though the City’s bizarre transport ban is one of a kind, it is exemplary of a broader push by local governments to restrict Second Amendment rights through means that would never fly in any other constitutional context,” says the brief from the rifle and pistol association and the gun owners asking the court to hear the case.

“Unable to flatly ban the possession of handguns in the home, many local governments have responded by erecting obstacles to acquiring them,” the brief adds.

Two GOP governors, Matt Bevin of Kentucky and Phil Bryant of Mississippi, joined the attorneys general of 15 other states in filing an amicus brief Tuesday supporting the petitioners.

Bevin’s general counsel, Steve Pitt, said in a statement that New York’s “restrictive regulations set a dangerous precedent” and impede the right to bear arms. “Kentucky has a fundamental interest in ensuring that the Second Amendment is preserved for our citizens and that the Commonwealth is not harmed by the liberal policies of other states,” he added.

The attorneys general who signed onto the brief hail from states including: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Montana, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.

Two lower federal courts, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in 2015, and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in February, have ruled in the city’s favor in the case.

In New York City people can hold two types of handgun permits.

One is a “premises” license, at issue in the current court case, which allows people to have a handgun at their home or business. The other is a “carry” license that permits a person to carry a concealed handgun in public if they can prove they have a special need for the weapon.

The city has argued in lower court proceedings that its law adheres to the Second Amendment, affording gun owners the ability to defend themselves in their city residences, and to remain proficient with their weapons by allowing access to the city’s authorized target ranges.

People are able to rent firearms at out-of-town ranges, and can keep guns at second homes, the city added. Those challenging the law are free to lobby for changes if they’re so inclined, New York conceded. But as written the statutes are not a constitutional rights violation.

The city has also noted that it previously had a “target license” that enabled people to legally travel with licensed handguns to certain locations outside of New York City. But it said during the lower court proceedings that this licensing program was eliminated after police observed “widespread abuses,” such as people transporting loaded firearms, and taking guns on planes.

In arguing that the Supreme Court should take up the case, the petitioners say the court needs to revisit its 5-4 decision in the 2008 case District of Columbia v. Heller, which struck down strict handgun regulations the District had in place and held that the Second Amendment confers “an individual right to keep and bear arms.”

In their amicus brief, the governors and attorneys general contend that in the decade since Heller, the Supreme Court has “avoided defining the parameters” for those rights, leaving states unsure what rights the Second Amendment protects and to what degree.

State and local authorities, the governors and attorneys general say, “cannot confidently enforce gun laws, counsel state legislatures, or provide accurate legal advice if the courts cannot clearly articulate the legal standards applied to review such laws.”

Discord between lower courts is a problem, according to the state officials. Three circuit courts, they say, have issued rulings that would have favored the plaintiffs in the New York City case.

Here they refer to Heller, along with the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision during 2010 in McDonald v. City of Chicago, another gun case. In McDonald, the court effectively ruled that protections outlined in Heller extend not only to federal law but also to state and local law.

But the governors and attorneys general say lower courts lack sufficient guidance on those rulings and “have chopped Heller and McDonald into fragments and strung them back together creating a patchwork of Frankensteinian rules of Second Amendment law.”

Making their case that the New York City law violates the Commerce Clause, the firearms group and gun owners say the statute blocks gun owners from patronizing shooting ranges outside of the city. They also say it deters them from traveling to second homes and other places.

The appeals court decision “forces petitioners to choose which constitutional right they would rather exercise: their right to travel or their right to keep and bear arms,” their brief says.

It adds: “If the City had banned its golfers from taking their clubs to out-of-state courses or its professional musicians from taking their instruments to out-of- state concert halls, it is hard to imagine that those restrictions on interstate commerce and travel would be tolerated.”

The Second Circuit addressed this type of comparison in its decision earlier this year, noting that the plaintiffs had argued that the city’s rule functions in the same way as a law requiring New York City residents to use their tennis rackets only at in-city tennis courts.

“Of course, tennis rackets present none of the public safety risks that firearms do, and against which states have a legitimate interest in protecting themselves,” the ruling said.

But the state officials sought to lend support to the argument that the New York City law runs afoul of the Commerce Clause, which gives Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states.

“By forbidding its citizens to leave the state with their firearms, New York City’s regulations— blessed by the Second Circuit—create a dissonance in the federal system,” they say in their brief. It adds that “wildlife tourism, which includes hunting, practicing, and competitive shooting, is a multibillion dollar industry in the United States.”

After the Supreme Court’s Heller decision, Washington, D.C. enacted a ban on semi-automatic rifles and magazines that accept more than 10 rounds, along with gun registration requirements. Dick Heller, the plaintiff in the handgun case, and others sued over the rules.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia in 2011 upheld the semi-automatic weapon prohibitions and other parts of the law. Dissenting was Judge Brett Kavanaugh, who was sworn in to the U.S. Supreme Court on Saturday after a contentious Senate confirmation.

“It follows from Heller’s protection of semi-automatic handguns,” he wrote, “that semi-automatic rifles are also constitutionally protected and that D.C.’s ban on them is unconstitutional.”

One of the lawyers representing the The New York State Rifle & Pistol Association and other plaintiffs in the New York City case is Paul Clement, a partner with Kirkland & Ellis LLP, and a former U.S. solicitor general under former President George W. Bush.

New York City requested and has been granted a 30-day extension to file its response to the petition for the case to be heard before the Supreme Court. The response is due by Nov. 8.

Bill Lucia is a Senior Reporter for Government Executive's Route Fifty and is based in Washington, D.C.

FEATURED CASE STUDIES
Powered By The Atlas
Forecasting Ambulance Needs for the City of San Diego
San Diego, CA, USA
A large urban park creates a "connected" visitor experience with SMART.NODEs™
Sydney NSW, Australia
Community feedback increases 13x in Lancaster, PA with both offline and online engagement methods
Lancaster, PA, USA

NEXT STORY: Police Departments Are at a Digital Training Crossroads

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.