Southern governors raise pressure in fights with auto unions

United Auto Workers (UAW) President Shawn Fain speaks at a UAW vote watch party on April 19, 2024 in Chattanooga, Tennessee. With over 51% of workers voting yes the UAW won the right to form a union at the plant.

United Auto Workers (UAW) President Shawn Fain speaks at a UAW vote watch party on April 19, 2024 in Chattanooga, Tennessee. With over 51% of workers voting yes the UAW won the right to form a union at the plant. Elijah Nouvelage/Getty Images

 

Connecting state and local government leaders

Republican officials want to tell automakers that get big financial incentives for new factories that they have to use secret ballots during unionization efforts.

Republican officials are gearing up for more fights over unionization efforts at auto plants after a historic vote in Tennessee last week.

Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp signed a law Monday that bars companies that get big tax incentives from the state for building mega-projects, such as auto factories, from voluntarily recognizing unions without a secret ballot. Alabama lawmakers followed suit later in the week, approving a similar measure there. The bills are based on a Tennessee law passed last year, which the conservative group the American Legislative Exchange Council has been promoting.

Supporters of the measures said they would allow workers to decide whether they want to join a union using a secret ballot.

“We are ensuring that when the state invests state resources to drive job creation, that hardworking Georgians who hold those jobs have the agency to determine whether to be represented by a labor union,” Republican state Rep. Soo Hong said last month, according to the Georgia Recorder.

But union leaders and Democrats say the laws violate the National Labor Relations Act, which governs the process for how labor unions are recognized. Under the law, companies can voluntarily recognize unions that present evidence—like signed cards—that a majority of its workers favor a union. But they can also insist on an election with secret ballots.

“Let’s be clear: What this bill wants to do—prohibit Georgia businesses receiving state economic subsidies from voluntarily recognizing a union in their workplace—is federally illegal,” the Georgia AFL-CIO said in a statement. “When workers are asking for basic rights and are supported by the employer, the state government stepping in to ban that recognition simultaneously harms workers and takes away individual freedoms from business owners.”

Southern states have fared well so far in the scramble to move the auto industry from gas-powered vehicles to electric ones. They’ve used tax incentives to attract plants to build EVs and batteries, often courting foreign manufacturers that need to produce components in the U.S. to qualify for federal tax credits. The surge in EV projects follows two decades of Southern states pursuing manufacturing jobs, particularly in industries like aerospace and auto manufacturing where organized labor has thrived.

The region, though, has long been resistant to unions. Every state in the South is a “right to work” state, where employees cannot be forced to join a union or pay a fee for union representation even if the workplace has been unionized. Southern states have some of the lowest rates of union workers in the country.

Labor unions in the South also have struggled to gain recognition to represent workers in contract negotiations, which makes last week’s vote by workers at a Volkswagen plant in Chattanooga to join the United Auto Workers particularly significant. Nearly three quarters of the workers there supported the unionization effort.

The union victory comes just months after UAW secured big raises for workers at Ford, GM and Stellantis after simultaneous strikes against the Detroit automakers. UAW President Shawn Fain has said he wants to increase the union’s reach to factories in the South, starting with a vote at Mercedes plants in Alabama May 13 to 17. A Hyundai factory in Alabama and a Toyota facility in Missouri could be among the next to vote.

Kemp and Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey were among six GOP governors that put out a statement last week warning about the impact that unionizing Southern factories could have on the region’s economy. They blamed the UAW for “misinformation and scare tactics.”

“Unionization would certainly put our states’ jobs in jeopardy—in fact, in this year already, all of the UAW automakers have announced layoffs,” the governors wrote.

“In America, we respect our workforce and we do not need to pay a third party to tell us who can pick up a box or flip a switch. No one wants to hear this, but it’s the ugly reality. We’ve seen it play out this way every single time a foreign automaker plant has been unionized; not one of those plants remains in operation. And we are seeing it in the fallout of the Detroit Three strike with those automakers rethinking investments and cutting jobs. Putting businesses in our states in that position is the last thing we want to do,” they added.

Governors Tate Reeves of Mississippi, Henry McMaster of South Carolina, Bill Lee of Tennessee and Greg Abbott of Texas also signed the letter. All are Republicans.

The joint statement comes after several of the governors individually blasted organized labor in recent months.

“We will not let our state’s economy suffer or become collateral damage as labor unions seek to consume new jobs and conscript new dues-paying members,” McMaster said in his February state of the state speech. “We will fight all the way to the gates of hell, and we will win.”

This week, Ivey called the UAW “corrupt, shifty and a dangerous leech.” She shared an opinion piece from House Speaker Nathaniel Ledbetter blasting the union and supporting the legislation to require secret ballots for union votes.

“The UAW business model is simple: Weaponize the workforce, drive up costs, destroy quality and send the state’s auto industry up in smoke,” Ledbetter wrote. “The UAW’s trail of destruction is well documented. Now that they’ve sucked all the blood out of cities like Detroit, they have southern states like Alabama in their crosshairs.”

But President Joe Biden, who appeared on the picket line with striking UAW members and secured the union’s endorsement in this year’s election, took issue with the Republican governors for opposing unionization efforts.

“Six Republican governors wrote a letter attempting to influence workers’ votes by falsely claiming that a successful vote would jeopardize jobs in their states,” the president said in a statement.

“Let me be clear to the Republican governors that tried to undermine this vote: there is nothing to fear from American workers using their voice and their legal right to form a union if they so choose,” he said. “In fact, the growing strength of unions over the last year has gone hand-in-hand with record small business and jobs growth alongside the longest stretch of low unemployment in more than 50 years.”

Keep reading as there’s more news to use below, and if you don’t already and would prefer to get this roundup in your inbox, you can subscribe to this newsletter here. We’ll see you next week.

News to Use

Trends, Common Challenges, Cool Ideas, FYIs and Notable Events

IMMIGRATION: Texas-style immigration bill goes to Oklahoma governor. Oklahoma’s state Senate sent the governor an anti-immigration bill on Tuesday that’s modeled after a new Texas law that allows police officers to detain suspected non-citizens. The bill would create the offense of “impermissible occupation,” which could be punished with fines or jail time for undocumented immigrants and require them to leave the state within 72 hours of their conviction or release from custody. Senate President Pro Tem Greg Treat said the legislation is necessary to protect Oklahoma citizens. “A scourge of illegal activities, including an increase in fentanyl, human trafficking and crime [affects] our communities because of the inaction and abject failure at the federal level to secure our borders,” he said. . In Alabama, a House committee approved a measure that would allow local law enforcement agencies to partner with federal agencies to arrest undocumented immigrants. Critics, though, compared it to a 2011 anti-immigrant law that permitted law enforcement to determine the immigration status of those they stop, detain or arrest. A court blocked enforcement of that law in 2013. The Alabama Sheriff’s Association also voiced concerns about how the current proposal would affect their operations. “We don’t have the resources  to enforce immigration,” said Jimmy Lambert, the association’s executive director. “Sheriffs can support it, but there is already an agency [the attorney general’s office] that does that.”

NEW CONSTITUTION: Jeff Landry's plan to draft a new state constitution faces opposition. Louisiana’s governor wants to rewrite the state constitution to make it easier for lawmakers to change policies that are currently included in the charter. But his proposal ran into a flood of complaints from lawmakers of both parties who are worried that the project is being rushed. Landry and state Rep. Beau Beaullieu, the governor’s point person on the effort, want legislators to approve the proposal within a month. That would set up a special convention on May 20, during which delegates would then remove unspecified items from the constitution and put them into statute. Voters would ultimately decide whether to adopt the new constitution on Nov. 5, the same day as the presidential election and congressional primaries in Louisiana.

TRIBES: Prairie Band Potawatomi becomes 1st federally recognized tribe in Illinois. Nearly 200 years after Native Americans were forced out of Illinois, the Prairie Band Potawatomi Nation became the first federally recognized tribal nation in the state. The recognition from the U.S. Department of the Interior represents the first victory in the tribe’s larger effort to regain approximately 1,280 acres of its ancestral land in Illinois through legislation in both the General Assembly and Congress. But the tribe first had to spend $10 million over the last 20 years to repurchase the first 130 acres of the Shab-eh-nay Reservation that the federal government illegally sold out from under Chief Shab-eh-nay around 1850. Last week, Prairie Band Chairman Joseph “Zeke” Rupnick—a fourth-great grandson of Chief Shab-eh-nay—signed paperwork that allows the Department of the Interior to place those 130 acres into a trust, which gives the tribe sovereignty over the land.

RAIL: Brightline West breaks ground on high-speed rail connecting Las Vegas to Southern California. Nevada Gov. Joe Lombardo, U.S. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg and other officials from Nevada and California broke ground Monday for a private railroad’s  218-mile high-speed rail line. They expressed high hopes the $12 billion project will revolutionize rail travel with its zero emission, fully electric trains capable of speeds of 200 miles per hour. Although Brightline West project will be operated by a private company, it has benefitted from public subsidies. The Biden administration awarded the project $3 billion from the  2021 infrastructure law. It also granted  the project  $3.5 billion in low-interest private activity bonds.. The rest of the project’s cost will be privately funded. The construction timeline is about four years, with plans to have the system up and running before the 2028 Olympic Games in Los Angeles.

MINNESOTA: Will a break-in put the brakes on the Minnesota DFL’s state government trifecta? The Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party’s hold on power may be in jeopardy. Sen. Nicole Mitchell was arrested for breaking into her stepmother’s home in Detroit Lakes, Minnesota. But the Senate’s one-vote majority has been weakened when motions and bills pass 34-33. Because Mitchell is out of jail and still a member of the Senate, her vote will be the focus for the rest of the session, certainly for minority Republican members but also in any assessments for what might have happened had Mitchell not been there. Any number of scenarios are possible between now and the end of the legislative session on May 20, according to MinnPost, from Mitchell resigning to her remaining as the centerpiece of a distracted session. In a preview of coming debates, Senate Republicans filed an ethics complaint Wednesday morning, and then moved to have the ethics committee take up the case immediately with an expulsion of Mitchell as a possible outcome. DFLers, with Mitchell excused, argued against the motion which then failed on a 33-33 vote and canceled floor action on bills.

ELECTION INTERFERENCE: Arizona charges Giuliani and other Trump allies in election interference case. Arizona has become the fourth swing state to bring an elections interference case involving the activities of the Trump campaign in 2020. The indictment this week against Rudolph W. Giuliani, Mark Meadows, and a number of others who advised Donald Trump during the 2020 election includes conspiracy, fraud and forgery charges related to alleged attempts by the defendants to overturn Arizona’s election results. According to the indictment, they are accused of pressuring “officials responsible for certifying election results to encourage them to change the election results,” including the governor, the legislature and the Maricopa Board of Supervisors. In all, 35 people who acted as fake electors in Arizona, Georgia, Nevada and Michigan face criminal charges for signing certificates in 2020 falsely stating that Trump had won their state’s electoral votes. Additionally, this week, Trump was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the investigation by the Michigan attorney general’s office into interference in the 2020 election.

CAMPUS PROTESTS: Police arrest more than two dozen pro-Palestinian demonstrators on UT-Austin campus amid tense standoff. A student walkout at the University of Texas at Austin in support of Palestinians turned chaotic Wednesday when more than 100 troopers from the Texas Department of Public Safety deployed by Gov. Greg Abbott tried to disperse protesters and arrested at least 34 people, including two members of the media. On social media, Abbott called for the demonstrating students to be kicked out of school. “Students joining in hate-filled, antisemitic protests at any public college or university in Texas should be expelled,” he wrote. Pro-Palestine protests at Columbia led the university president to request the New York City Police Department come onto campus and arrest demonstrators who refused to leave. In an April 21 statement, New York City Mayor Eric Adams said, “We will not be a city of lawlessness, and those professional agitators seeking to seize the ongoing conflict in the Middle East to sow chaos and division in our city will not succeed.” In Indiana, a rally organized by Jewish Voice for Peace of Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis blocked traffic outside Gov. Eric Holcomb's residence in Indianapolis, leading to 14 arrests. Similar protests have been held at many other universities, including New York University, Yale University, MIT, the University of Michigan and Stanford University.

POLLUTION: EPA severely limits pollution from coal-burning power plants. A new regulation from the Environmental Protection Agency requires coal plants in the U.S. to reduce 90% of their greenhouse pollution by 2039, a year earlier than the agency had initially proposed. It also imposed three additional regulations on coal-burning power plants—including stricter limits on emissions of mercury—from plants that burn lignite coal, the lowest grade of coal. The rules also more tightly restrict the seepage of toxic ash from coal plants into water supplies and limit the discharge of wastewater from coal plants. The compressed timeline was welcomed by climate activists but condemned by coal executives who said the new standards would be impossible to meet, The New York Times reported. Taken together, the regulations could fatally cripple the U.S. coal industry, which still has supporters. Congressional Republicans have announced plans to overturn the rules. And West Virginia Republican Attorney General Patrick Morrisey, who led the legal charge against the Obama administration’s greenhouse gas rule for power plants, vowed to challenge this version. “We are confident this new rule is not going to be upheld, and it just seems designed to scare more coal-fired power plants into retirement — the goal of the Biden administration,” he said.

ABORTION, part 1: Arizona House votes to repeal the 1864 abortion ban. The Arizona House of Representatives voted Wednesday to repeal a near-total abortion ban from 1864, after the Arizona Supreme Court earlier this month upheld the Civil War-era law, which carries with it a mandatory prison sentence for doctors who provide an abortion for any reason other than saving a woman’s life. Republicans who supported the 1864 near-total ban denounced the repeal during floor speeches and criticized their colleagues who they viewed as going against the party’s core values. Republican Rep. Tim Dunn, meanwhile, justified his vote to strike down the 1864 law by saying it was the only option left to defeat a pro-abortion initiative headed for the November ballot. And, he added, the 15-week limit approved in 2022 is preferable because it includes more leeway for women who face dangerous pregnancy complications.

ABORTION, part 2: GOP ethics complaints target 2 Arizona House Democrats for 'attempted insurrection’ after abortion repeal debate. Two House Democrats have been hit with ethics complaints for behavior Republicans characterized as “an attempted insurrection” in the aftermath of an April 10 debate about Arizona's 1864 abortion law. The complaint says Phoenix Democrats Rep. Oscar de los Santos, the assistant minority leader, and Rep. Analise Ortiz led fellow Democrats in chants of “shame, shame” after the House abruptly went into a recess rather than consider a motion to repeal the 160-year-old law. The complaint accuses De Los Santos of disorderly behavior, violation of House decorum rules and impermissible debate. In a statement, the two lawmakers defended their actions, saying they were representing their constituents in decrying what they called “the callous, heartless, and most importantly dangerous actions” of GOP leadership by not allowing a vote on a repeal of the abortion law. House Ethics chairman Joseph Chaplik on Thursday said committee members are reviewing the complaints and to “stay tuned” for whether there will be a formal hearing.

WATER CRISIS: Flint residents to Biden: Pay up for decade-old federal failures in water crisis. On the 10th anniversary of the lead poisoning of drinking water in Flint, Michigan, city residents are calling on President Joe Biden to acknowledge a federal role in the disaster and approve funds to settle a 7-year-old lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The state of Michigan agreed in 2020 to pay $600 million for its role, and the city of Flint settled for $20 million in the same massive lawsuit. But the EPA, which is charged with ensuring compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act, has never acknowledged liability for its role, despite a paper trail that shows its officials knew about dangerously inadequate treatment of water from the Flint River months before residents were notified. 

RENT RELIEF: San Francisco saved 10,000 households from eviction during the pandemic. A new city report shows the rental assistance program pushed by the board of supervisors early in the pandemic saved as many as 20,000 people from eviction and possibly homelessness. Most of the money that funded the Emergency Rental Assistance Program came from two progressive measures, including Prop. C and Prop. I, which taxed big corporations and high-end real-estate deals to provide revenue for addressing and preventing homelessness. About of the people who received rental assistance were Black or Latinx, and 87% earned less than 30% of the area median income, making them particularly vulnerable to homelessness. 
 

WHAT THEY’RE SAYING

“Trans movements and trans leaders are winning, and I think that this is the equivalent of a temper tantrum.”

Z Williams, co-director of the Denver nonprofit Bread and Roses Legal Center that offers legal services in support of LGBTQ communities about a complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Colorado.  The complaint was filed by two residents who intentionally misgendered transgender people in their testimony against a bill that would allow people to change their names to conform with their gender identity under certain circumstances. The two are suing the legislators who cut them off and asked them to stop misgendering and deadnaming transgender people. The plaintiffs claim their First Amendment rights were violated when their testimony was stopped and that the legislators wrongfully discriminated against them when enforcing rules of decorum based on their views against the bill and transgender rights. They argue that making a witness acknowledge someone as transgender is compelled speech. A hearing has yet to be scheduled in the case.

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.