Connecting state and local government leaders
COMMENTARY | A new study identifies the reasons that draw people back a decade or two after leaving: public schools, population density and other college-degree holders in the community.
Many academics and journalists have written about rural “brain drain,” the migration of talented and bright young people who leave their communities, usually in search of better economic opportunities.
The new findings show college graduates between 34 and 43 years of age are more likely to return to the rural communities where they grew up if they have a strong attachment to their public K-12 schools. Feeling like their teachers cared or that they were part of the school community and had close friends were significant drivers.
When examining high school characteristics, the researchers found the size of the school mattered; participants who attended a high school with more than 350 students were 74% less likely to return home than participants who attended a school with fewer than 125 students.
“We often hear that rural schools aren’t as good as their urban counterparts, but here is an example where they are in a unique position to foster strong relationships and a sense of belonging, which can have long-term impacts,” says Stephanie Sowl, a PhD candidate in higher education at Iowa State University and coauthor of the study in Rural Sociology.
Sowl and colleagues also found college graduates between 34 and 43 years of age were more likely to return to the rural communities where they lived as teens if the communities had lower population densities and fewer postsecondary degree holders.
She says a possible explanation is that people felt like they could have a bigger impact in smaller hometowns, whether through volunteering, filling leadership roles, or bringing in new ideas.
“When people return to these rural communities, there are not only population benefits and economic benefits, but also an influx of new skills and knowledge,” she says.
People who return to their hometowns tend to be better positioned to create change and spur development because they already have connections and a better understanding of the community context. “I think there’s power in returning to a place where people know you,” Sowl says.
To identify the factors drawing college graduates back to rural communities, researchers pulled data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, which was designed to follow the health outcomes of youth through adulthood. The study has periodically surveyed and interviewed a national sample of 20,000 participants since the mid-1990s and includes data on community and environmental factors.
The researchers looked at the longitudinal study’s first wave of data collected when the participants were in grades 7-12. The third wave provided the researchers with data from those who attended college away from home, and the fifth wave offered insights into college graduates between the ages of 34 and 43.
Their data analysis showed 23.1% of the college graduates between 34 and 43 years old had returned to the same county where they lived during the first wave of data collection, and for every one unit increase in school attachment, study participants were 66% more likely to return.
“A lot of the previous research on the migration of college graduates looked at people right after earning their degree; our study focuses on people in their mid-30s to early 40s who are going to be more stable and financially secure,” says Sowl. “During this life stage, they may also have a shift in priorities that would lead them back to their hometowns.”
Older college graduates may be more interested in a safe place to raise their kids, good schools, affordable housing, and open space. Other life events, like needing to care for older relatives, divorce, or taking over a family farm could also affect this decision to move back.
The researchers emphasize that understanding why people leave rural communities and what promotes their return could help local and state leaders enact targeted strategies to counter “brain drain” and support “brain gain.”
They say their findings underscore the importance of investing in public K-12 schools and opportunities to foster a sense of belonging in youth. The researchers suggest schools and community partners introduce youth to careers in the area so that they are aware of opportunities later in life.
“Rural communities have a lot of assets that are hidden from the broader public. It’s important for all of us to look at those assets and understand how communities can draw people back home to create thriving, more equitable communities,” Sowl says.
Rachel Cramer is an assistant professor at Iowa State University.
NEXT STORY: The Great Resignation: Historical Data and a Deeper Analysis Show It’s Not as Great as Screaming Headlines Suggest