State Supreme Court Rules Pension Credits Don't Deserve Special Protection

Former California governor, Jerry Brown, points to a chart showing his plan to fund teacher pensions in May of 2014.

Former California governor, Jerry Brown, points to a chart showing his plan to fund teacher pensions in May of 2014. AP Photo/File

 

Connecting state and local government leaders

But it stops short of reworking the “California Rule,” which restricts how retirement benefits can be altered in some states.

California is free to eliminate credits it previously allowed public employees to purchase so that they could increase their retirement benefits, the state’s Supreme Court ruled on Monday.  

The case was being watched closely by those with an interest in public pensions because of its possible implications for the so-called “California Rule”—a legal construct that makes it difficult for state and local governments to roll back pension benefits for their workers.

Although the decision does not reshape how the California Rule has been understood previously, it does conclude that the credits fall outside of the rule’s protection, and suggests there could be other pension-related policies and practices that do as well.

“It rejects the broadest possible reading of the California Rule,” Alexander "Sasha" Volokh, a law professor at Emory University, in Atlanta, said of the ruling.

Grounded in past court decisions, the thrust of the California Rule is that governments can’t cut pension benefits for current employees unless they offer a comparable offset in return.

It’s built on the legal bedrock of the “contract clause” found in the U.S. Constitution and many state constitutions, which prohibits states from “impairing” contracts with the laws that they enact.

At issue in the case decided Monday were “additional retirement service,” or ARS, credits, authorized for many public employees in California back in 2003.

Informally dubbed “air time,” the program allowed workers to purchase credits to add up to five years to the amount of time they had actually worked for the purpose of calculating their pension benefits.

Years of service is one of the factors that determines pension benefits and this system provided a way for a person who worked, say, 15 years to receive benefits as if they’d worked up to 20.

The thinking with the credits is that someone who started a state job later in their career, or left one for a few years to raise kids or go back to school, would be able to use the program to raise their pension benefits and gain access to a “livable” retirement income.

Lawmakers anticipated the program would be “cost neutral” based on the price employees would pay for credits.

But an analysis by the California Public Employees' Retirement System, mentioned in the court ruling, found that between 1997 and 2007 the methodology for calculating the price of the credits underestimated their cost by between 12 and 38 percent.

In late 2012, the state Legislature enacted a pension reform package that, beginning on Jan. 1, 2013, effectively repealed the law that allowed for the purchase of the credits. It did not, however, revoke or alter credits for employees that had bought them before that time.

Cal Fire Local 2881, which represents employees for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, a state agency that fights wildfires and responds to other types of emergencies, and four Cal Fire employees, challenged the elimination of the credits in court.

Monday’s unanimous state Supreme Court ruling in Cal Fire Local 2881 v. California Public Employees' Retirement System was authored by Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye.

It explains that two overarching issues were in play in the case.

One was whether the credits were a “vested” right, protected under the contract clause.

If the court had decided that the credit program cleared that legal bar, the justices would have had to consider a second question: whether the elimination of the credits amounted to an unconstitutional violation of employees’ rights.

The court decided that the credits are not protected so it did not consider this second question.

“We conclude that the opportunity to purchase ARS credit was not a right protected by the contract clause,” the court’s opinion says.

“In the absence of constitutional protection, the opportunity to purchase ARS credit could be altered or eliminated at the discretion of the Legislature,” the ruling adds.

Volokh said if the court had ruled in favor of the workers it “would've been totally in tune with the vibe” of the California Rule. "This is a bit surprising in that they say, ‘No not everything related to pensions is actually a promise,” he said.

The court acknowledges the state and others had urged them to use the case as a chance to reexamine the California Rule more broadly.

But the ruling says that because the credits, unlike “core pension rights,” fall outside the scope of benefits protected by the contract clause, “we have no occasion in this decision to address, let alone to alter, the continued application” of the rule.

The state Supreme Court decision aligns with two lower court rulings in the case.

A 1947 ruling from the state Supreme Court in the case Kern v. City of Long Beach was key in laying the groundwork for the California Rule.

The court concluded in that ruling that pension benefits constitute a form of deferred compensation and are, therefore, a contractual right afforded constitutional protections. Court rulings in the years since have followed this guideline.

In contrast, the court's latest decision characterizes the ARS credits as “optional benefits,” akin to different types of health insurance, life insurance, or certain flexible spending accounts.

Moody’s Investors Service last year found that California’s “adjusted net pension liability,” a measure of the benefits the state will owe to its retirees in future years, is about $193 billion, or 117 percent of state revenue. By comparison the median level of net pension liabilities as a percentage of state revenue was about 82 percent across all 50 states.

Volokh describes the California Rule as it has been applied as "kind of a one way ratchet.”

“The state is allowed to give you more pension benefits, but is not allowed to change the rules to be less generous,” he said. “It reduces the flexibility of states.”

About a dozen other states follow the California Rule. While the credits ruling from California’s high court will not be binding in those places, it could provide lawyers in other states with a precedent to cite in similar disputes and may offer a pathway for other courts to follow.

There are other pension cases still pending before California’s state Supreme Court. One of those, Marin Association of Public Employees v. Marin County Employees’ Retirement Association, concerns a practice known as “pension spiking.”

That’s where employees use various methods to inflate their benefits as they approach retirement. In the Marin County case, public employees are challenging a revised state formula meant to tamp down on pension spiking.

A trial court concluded that the new formula was not an unconstitutional contract violation. An appeals court agreed.

Volokh raised the possibility that the ruling in the Cal Fire case might indicate the state Supreme Court will take a similar approach when considering laws meant to curtail pension spiking.

“There are a lot of individual benefits that could fall by the wayside,” he said, “if this reasoning is used more broadly.”

Bill Lucia is a Senior Reporter for Route Fifty and is based in Olympia, Washington.

NEXT STORY: Where Unpaid Water Bills Can Mean Losing a Home

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.