Cities, States Urge Supreme Court to Hear Homeless Camping Ban Case

Denver Police Department officers keep watch during a sweep of homeless people who were living on the walks surrounding a shelter near the baseball stadium Tuesday, Nov. 15, 2016, in downtown Denver.

Denver Police Department officers keep watch during a sweep of homeless people who were living on the walks surrounding a shelter near the baseball stadium Tuesday, Nov. 15, 2016, in downtown Denver. AP Photo/David Zalubowski

 

Connecting state and local government leaders

After a Boise, Idaho law that prohibits sleeping in public spaces was ruled unconstitutional by an appellate court, some local governments are raising concerns about how they can now legally address problems stemming from homeless people living on the streets.

Dozens of cities and states across the country are encouraging the Supreme Court to hear and clarify, if not fully overturn, an appellate court ruling that bans municipalities from prosecuting homeless people for sleeping on the streets.

The case stems from a 2018 decision against the city of Boise, Idaho, which local governments argue has undercut their ability to maintain public spaces and enforce public health and safety laws. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found that when there is no option of sleeping indoors, “the government cannot criminalize indigent, homeless people for sleeping outdoors, on public property, on the false premise they had a choice in the matter.”

Local governments in Western states, as well as a coalition of seven states, filed amicus briefs last week to encourage the high court to hear the case.

Some cities, like Los Angeles, agree with the underlying finding in the Boise case—that individuals should not be prosecuted for sleeping on the sidewalk at night if no shelter is available. But the city said it simply does not have the capacity or resources to be able to provide beds for the 27,000 unsheltered homeless people who live in the city.

“The city cannot build housing or shelter for 27,000 individuals overnight. As a result, thousands of unsheltered Angelenos have no choice but to dwell in public spaces,” the city wrote in an amicus brief filed last week.

The League of Oregon Cities argued that the ruling creates “a hopelessly unworkable framework” that cities must navigate before they can prohibit a person from sleeping on city property.

Compliance with the ruling is next to impossible given the difficulty in counting a jurisdiction’s homeless population and determining exactly how many shelter beds are needed, the league wrote. Further, the group said many shelters run by religious organizations would not count toward the number of shelter beds because of issues raised in the ruling about shelters that require people to take part in some religious programs.

Los Angeles was also concerned about the ambiguity of the ruling and further implications regarding the responsibilities of state that local governments if they are barred from prohibiting conduct considered an “unavoidable consequence” of being homeless.

“Humans need to eat. Must the city allow open flame cooking in public?” the city wrote. “All humans must relieve themselves. Must the city suspend enforcement of its ban on public defecation in the absence of a certain number of public toilets? How many toilets are required?”

The Boise lawsuit was originally filed in 2009 by homelessness advocacy groups on behalf of six homeless people who had received citations under the city’s camping ban.

A 9th Circuit panel in September 2018 agreed with the plaintiffs and the full appellate court earlier this year declined to review the case. The National Law Center on Homelessness and Poverty, which brought the case, at that time said the ruling signaled that cities should start proposing real solutions to homelessness. Eric Tars, legal director for the group, said cities should be spending time creating alternatives for people sleeping on the street. 

“Getting homeless people into housing is a win-win approach, benefitting both the individuals helped and the communities that no longer have to deal with the negative impacts of people living in public spaces, at lower cost than cycling people through the criminal justice system,” he said in a statement.

Arguing that the 9th Circuit ruling should be overturned, other municipal associations and cities detailed the effects of homelessness, as well as their efforts to address related problems.

The Brentwood Community Council, which represents an unincorporated neighborhood on the outskirts of Los Angeles, wrote that concerns raised by residents about large homeless encampments range from battling daily fires that start in encampments, and behavior or homeless people who have exposed themselves to children who walk past or thrown rocks at cars that drive by.

In Denver, lawmakers passed a ban on unauthorized camping on public and private property in 2012. The city has taken strides to address the local homeless crisis, but simply allowing people to camp in public spaces will not help homeless individuals deal with any underlying issues nor will it help the communities in which they camp, argued the Downtown Denver Partnership.

“For Denver, such judicial policy could result in the unauthorized encampment of Red Rocks Amphitheater, the Denver Zoo, or any of the City’s major urban parks, like Washington Park, City Park, and Sloan’s Lake; the contamination of the South Platte River and Denver’s other waterways with human waste; and the occupation of Denver’s business and cultural centers, leading to economic downfall,” the partnership wrote.

Denver’s ban on public camping has not translated to a severe crackdown on the city’s homeless, the partnership wrote. The group said the Denver Police Department officers detailed to homeless outreach unit primarily relies on support services over criminal citations, according to an amicus brief filed by partnership.

“Since 2013, DPD officers have conducted over 11,700 checks, reaching over 18,000 people on the streets,” the partnership wrote. “Of those thousands of street checks, officers only issued 32 criminal citations for violations of the camping ordinance.”

Six states argued that the Boise ruling also infringes on their right to protect the public health and safety.

“Homelessness is a complex issue that challenges states and local governments,” attorneys general from Alaska, Idaho, Indiana, Louisiana, Nebraska, South Dakota and Texas wrote. “The Ninth Circuit’s decision prevents states from enforcing necessary public health and safety laws prohibiting sleeping and camping in certain circumstances, and it has also raised the specter of unconstitutionality over a wide range of vital criminal laws, including the basic law of trespass.”

A response by lawyers representing the homeless individuals who brought the case is due by October 25.

Andrea Noble is a staff correspondent with Route Fifty.

FEATURED CASE STUDIES
Powered By The Atlas
A large urban park creates a "connected" visitor experience with SMART.NODEs™
Sydney NSW, Australia
Community feedback increases 13x in Lancaster, PA with both offline and online engagement methods
Lancaster, PA, USA
Erie County, PA offers all local restaurants free digital tools to plan for safe COVID reopening
Erie County, PA, USA

NEXT STORY: Vegan School Lunches Expand Despite Opposition From Meat Industry

X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.